UK POLITICS: Corbyn Could Be UK PM in Different Vote System: Study

Politicoscope
By Politicoscope August 23, 2017 08:00
MOST POPULAR YOU MAY LIKE

POLITICS HOME: Current Political Article


The UK’s current first-past-the-post (FPTP) system prevented Labour from getting 35 seats in the House of Commons in the recent general election, where Theresa May saved her position despite losing seats to the opposition, according to the study by the Electoral Reform Society (ERS) published Monday.

Continue below with the full current political topic.

UK POLITICS: Corbyn Could Be UK PM in Different Vote System: Study

UK Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn could have dethroned Prime Minister Theresa May in the recent general election if the election system was not biased towards the ruling Conservatives, a new study has found.

The UK’s current first-past-the-post (FPTP) system prevented Labour from getting 35 seats in the House of Commons in the recent general election, where Theresa May saved her position despite losing seats to the opposition, according to the study by the Electoral Reform Society (ERS) published Monday.

May hoped that her gamble in calling a snap vote to win a stronger majority in the parliament would pay off. However, the outcome of the June 8 vote was nothing short of a disaster as her party lost 14 of the 330 seats they had before. Labour, on the other hand, clinched 30 new seats to reach a total of 261.

The ERS said at least 22 million votes—nearly two-thirds of the total—were “wasted” in the election since they were cast for candidates who did not win or won more votes than they needed to secure the seat.

This is expected in an FPTP voting system, where a very small number of voters in marginal constituencies can ultimately determine the entire result.

That is why some 6.5 million people voted tactically to ensure that their vote was not going to waste because they were living in areas that their favorite parties had no chance to win, the study found.

The ERS also claimed that only if 0.0016 percent of voters had voted differently the Tories would have won an overall majority in the parliament, saving May the embarrassment of asking the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) to help her form a majority government.

Alternative systems
The ERS and YouGov asked 13,000 people how they would have voted under different systems.

It turned out that Labour would have defeated the Tories 197-182 under the Single Transferable Vote (STV) system, which is used in Northern Ireland and for local elections in Scotland. In this scenario, the Liberal Democrats would have gained 29 seats.

Labour would have won even 24 more seats in the Alternative Vote (AV) system and Additional Member System (AMS).

Under AMS, the Lib Dems would have secured 19 seats, more than three times what they won under FPTP.

“June’s election has shown first-past-the-post is unable to cope with people’s changing voting habits – forcing citizens and parties to try and game the system,” wrote Darren Hughes, Chief Executive of the Electoral Reform Society, noting that “voters have been denied real choice and representation.”

“As we’ve shown, tiny shifts in the vote result in drastically different outcomes. Having results hinge on a few hundred voters is no way to run a modern democracy,” added Hughes, whose organization pushes for electoral reform in the UK.

– Press TV



Readers Who Read this Article Also Read



Up Next on Politicoscope

Share this Article: "UK POLITICS: Corbyn Could Be UK PM in Different Vote System: Study"



Since You’re Here, We Would Like to ask You for Help
There are more readers worldwide reading the Politicoscope daily news content than ever before. Unlike many other news media organisations that charge their readers subscription fees for the same daily news content and features we offer you for free, we do not charge all our readers to pay any fee. We depend on online advertising to generate the revenues to fund all these great news content and exclusive features provided to you for free. Currently, advertising revenues are quickly falling which is affecting our ability to offer you free online news content.
If everyone who reads our news content, likes it and helps to support it, we can have future guarantee to offer you with the best daily news content and other amazing features, all for free.
"I visit Politicoscope everyday to read my daily news in world politics. I'm glad it's all for free. On my part, I'm happy to donate monthly so as to continue enjoying these free content because it's actually a small amount from me compared to paid subscriptions by other news organisations. I want to help Politicoscope grow more so that I and other readers can continue to have access to free and exclusive daily online news." - Denise H., from LA, USA.
Help keep Politicoscope alive and grow stronger for you.

Donate Online Today


Politicoscope
By Politicoscope August 23, 2017 08:00
Since You’re Here, We Would Like to ask You for Help
There are more readers worldwide reading the Politicoscope daily news content than ever before. Unlike many other news media organisations that charge their readers subscription fees for the same daily news content and features we offer you for free, we do not charge all our readers to pay any fee. We depend on online advertising to generate the revenues to fund all these great news content and exclusive features provided to you for free. Currently, advertising revenues are quickly falling which is affecting our ability to offer you free online news content.
If everyone who reads our news content, likes it and helps to support it, we can have future guarantee to offer you with the best daily news content and other amazing features, all for free.
"I visit Politicoscope everyday to read my daily news in world politics. I'm glad it's all for free. On my part, I'm happy to donate monthly so as to continue enjoying these free content because it's actually a small amount from me compared to paid subscriptions by other news organisations. I want to help Politicoscope grow more so that I and other readers can continue to have access to free and exclusive daily online news." - Denise H., from LA, USA.
Help keep Politicoscope alive and grow stronger for you.

Donate Online

$
Personal Info

Donation Total: $10.00



What's on Your Mind?